After missteps, Dunkin’ Donuts Set for California Expansion

September 4, 2014

pictureChastened by early mistakes, company takes a 2d shot in the state Starbucks rules

By Taryn Luna

Globe Correspondent

Al Golub/AP for the Globe

Dunkin’ Donuts launches its campaign in Modesto, Calif.

Dunkin’ Donuts, the coffee chain so familiar in the Northeast, is nearing the end of an expansion march across the country to become a true national brand.

The retailer kicked off its California expansion on Tuesday, the first step in a strategy to challenge Starbucks’ stronghold on the West Coast.

The company once operated more than a dozen restaurants in the state but shuttered them by the early 2000s, citing logistical problems and poor relationships with franchisee partners.

Dunkin’ temporarily abandoned its California dreams as the international business grew to more than 3,000 restaurants. Today the chain serves its signature Munchkins and Coolattas at nearly 900 stores in South Korea, but has only three nontraditional stores in obscure California locations: on a Marine base, inside a hotel, and at a highway rest stop.

Now the coffee chain is preparing to take another shot in a market where its toughest competitor, Starbucks Corp., dominates with more than 2,500 stores.

Dunkin’ plans to open its first traditional restaurant in Modesto, Calif., on Tuesday and a second store in Santa Monica in the following weeks.

Three additional restaurants in Long Beach, Downey, and Whittier are expected before the end of the year. Franchisees have signed agreements to open nearly 200 stores by 2020 and the company intends to eventually grow to 1,000 stores in the state.

“We’ve learned a lot about operating out West,” said Nigel Travis, chief executive of Dunkin’ Brands. “We’ve been incredibly impressed with the quality of the franchisees.”

But Dunkin’ had to learn the hard way.

The chain was so eager to enter California in the 1990s that it “hopscotched a lot of the country,” said Grant Benson, vice president of global franchising and business development at Dunkin’ Brands.

The nearest distribution center was in Chicago, and truck drivers hauled products thousands of miles to the California stores. “It left a lot of gaps where we didn’t have a supply chain and any development,” Benson said.

Travis has also said that Dunkin’ was less selective with its franchisee partners and did not properly train them.

Dunkin’ vs. Starbucks in California

Locations of the first new traditional restaurants in California, compared to the current locations of Starbucks restaurants in the Golden State.

The company renewed its plans to move into California a few years ago and began building up its network of stores in the West, entering Denver and Salt Lake City in the past year.

The California stores will be supplied from a Phoenix distribution center, and the company intends to open a new warehouse in California as more restaurants get off the ground.

Benson said the chain has also upgraded its training program. It is working with a mix of existing franchisees that operate Dunkin’ restaurants in other states and new partners with experience in California.

Software programs that aggregate data on demographics, competition, and traffic will help the company select the best locations for restaurants, he said.

Darren Tristano, an executive vice president at the food industry research firm Technomic, said that California is a major growth opportunity for the Canton company.

Dunkin’ was the second-largest coffee chain in the United States last year, with $6.7 billion in annual sales and a 30.9 percent market share, according to Technomic. Starbucks posted $11.7 billion in sales and a 53.8 percent share last year. Technomic does not track sales by state.

And although Dunkin’ is entering a region dominated by Starbucks, it will appeal to a different customer, Tristano said.

Starbucks typically opens in middle- to upper-income neighborhoods and generally draws more affluent consumers, Tristano said. Dunkin’ prices are slightly lower, and the chain primarily draws middle- to lower-income consumers who represent a larger percentage of the workforce.

The stores tend to be smaller than at Starbucks, which means Dunkin’ pays less for real estate. They also can open more stores in nontraditional spaces, such as gas stations and convenience stores, he said.

Dunkin’ will serve its hot brews in paper cups in California — a move Tristano lauded and said environmentally conscious consumers will expect in the Golden State. The company will use the same polypropylene recyclable cup that was introduced in Somerville in May to comply with a citywide ban on disposable polystyrene, often referred to as styrofoam.

“When you look at how the brand has evolved over time, they should have a pretty good opportunity to grow there,” he said. “Today I think the California market is ready for Dunkin’.”


It’s Good to be King

September 3, 2014

burgerking-304xx3148-2112-482-0Emon Reiser

© 2014 American City Business Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

Burger King responded to the public outrage it inspired this week by saying its deal to merge with Tim Hortons was about global growth, not tax evasion.

“We don’t expect there to be meaningful tax savings,” Daniel Schwartz, the 34-year-old CEO of Miami-based Burger King Worldwide, said during a conference call with media on Aug. 26.

The deal is more complicated than that. And the public isn’t buying Burger King’s characterizations. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, called for a Burger King boycott after the company announced the $11.4 billion deal to merge with the Canadian coffee and doughnut chain. So did MSNBC TV host Joe Scarborough.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., emailed supporters, asking them to sign a petition to tell Burger King to stay put: “Burger King told us they were proud to be in America, but now we know that was a whopper.”

The deal will create a new holding company for Burger King and Tim Hortons that will be based in Oakville, Ontario. The move was immediately characterized as a tax-inversion acquisition that would allow Burger King to skirt millions of dollars in corporate income tax payments to the U.S. government.

Petitions cropped up on the Internet. Social media commenters flame-broiled Burger King on Twitter and the company’s own Facebook page.

Some of the less vulgar comments:

 

  • “Liars. Tax dodgers.”
  • “Kiss my business goodbye forever.”
  • “I’m not boycotting your product, I’m merely relocating my loyalties.”

 

 

 

Burger King issued a response on Facebook hours after the deal was confirmed, assuring angry customers that it will continue to pay its “federal, state and local U.S. taxes.” The deal, however, will most assuredly lower its tax burden, particularly on dollars it earns offshore.

“Our headquarters will remain in Miami, where we were founded more than 60 years ago, and business will continue as usual at our restaurants around the world,” the fast-food chain wrote. “It’s about global growth for both brands.”

Burger King and Tim Hortons executives reiterated that stance on their conference call. But Schwartz, Burger King Chairman Alex Behring and Tim Hortons CEO Mark Caira never denied that the deal was a tax inversion.

The company paid a 27.5 percent rate in the U.S. last year – about the same rate it will pay in Canada.

The real tax savings potential lies in the income Burger King has earned offshore. The company gets nearly half of its revenue from other countries, and currently has nearly $905 million in cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet.

“Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents include balances held in foreign tax jurisdictions,” Burger King has disclosed in a regulatory filing.

Were the company to bring this cash to its headquarters to pay shareholder dividends or reinvest, it would have to pay perhaps one-third of it to the U.S. government in taxes.

In Canada, it would keep far more of this money – which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars to help fund its “global growth.”

In addition to any tax savings, the merger of these two fast-food giants will lower the costs of goods for both companies, said Alex Macedo, Burger King’s president for North America.

“These two brands will have more purchasing power, which will reduce the costs for our franchisees,” he said. “The overall support has been very good.”

It also helps to have Warren Buffett on your team. America’s most popular billionaire is financing 25 percent of the deal. Buffett has crusaded for higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, and has championed some of President Barack Obama’s ideas about tax policy. His involvement in this deal could be read as hypocritical, or as a sign that he doesn’t see it as driven by tax savings, either.

Local business leaders are pleased Burger King’s Miami headquarters would remain intact, along with its staff.

If anyone will feel the pain of this deal, it’s Burger King’s independent franchisees. Only 52 of its 13,667 restaurants are corporate-owned. In 2013, franchise restaurant revenues were four times that of company restaurant revenues, at $923.6 million and $222.7 million, respectively. So if customers stop eating Whoppers because they’re not American, it will hit the store sales of franchisees first. So far, they don’t seem concerned.

Guillermo Perales, who owns 191 Burger Kings in Florida and Texas, said that, if anything, sales are rising because of the backlash: “Besides the comeback of chicken fries, this is one of the best promotions we’ve had this year.”

Financiers, not franchisees, call the shots at Burger King. A global investment fund, 3G Capital, owns 70 percent of Burger King. It’s a Brazilian firm that has offices in New York and is used to crossing borders with its investments.

It’s betting Burger King customers will have short memories, or that the gains it achieves with its controversial move will overcome any losses in sales.

Some observers say it’s a safe bet.

“I don’t think Americans are concerned with where a brand is based,” said Darren Tristano, executive VP of Chicago-based food industry research firm Technomic.

Being labeled a corporate turncoat on social media hasn’t stopped companies from inversions. And ultimately, it’s problems with U.S. tax codes that are forcing some of America’s household names to leave, many tax experts have said.

Armando Hernandez, head of Hernandez and Co. CPAs in Coral Gables, said the advantages of tax inversion transactions can’t be ignored. After all, a company that doesn’t do an inversion faces steep taxes in the U.S. on earnings achieved abroad.

“If the tax adviser would recommend that their headquarters stay in the U.S., they would be committing malpractice,” he said.

Senior reporter Brian Bandell contributed to this report.

THE EVER-INCREASING MOVE TO TAX INVERSIONS

What is a tax inversion? A tax inversion describes when a U.S. company buys a foreign business and then shifts its headquarters outside the country – as Miami-based Burger King Worldwide (NYSE: BKW) plans to do with Canada’s Tim Hortons. Such a move carries many tax benefits for the companies, even though it largely stiffs U.S. tax collectors.

Why are tax inversions becoming more common? Companies are facing increasing costs, including modest ticks in inflation, higher health care tabs and even the potential for a higher minimum wage. At the same time, Canada and many European countries have cut their corporate tax rates.

What is the U.S. government doing about it? Almost nothing. While President Barack Obama has spoken out against the practice, tax reform is stalled in Congress.

What does the American public think? A wide swath of business-minded people believe anything a company can legally do to reduce its tax bill is a wise course. Others believe corporations should pay their share of income taxes. It’s an easily politicized issue. Walgreen Co. backed away from an inversion after too much of a backlash from its customers. Other companies have accomplished inversions without any backlash at all.

What are the benefits for a corporation? While they must still pay some taxes on their U.S. operations, companies achieve lower corporate income tax bills. Additionally, they can bring the cash they’ve earned overseas into their headquarters without paying taxes. This allows them to pay more dividends or invest in their operations. U.S. companies have accumulated about $2 trillion in cash overseas.

Does a company actually have to move its operational headquarters? No. Under current tax laws, companies don’t have to shift offices or executives overseas to be considered foreign. In the case of Burger King, the company will actually remain in Miami, but it’s corporate parent will be located in Canada.


What Obesity Problem Burger King’s Low-Calorie Satisfries Are a Total Flop

August 29, 2014

pictureThe fast-food chain plans to discontinue the healthier fried chunks of potato in most of its U.S. restaurants.

By Liz Dwyer

Americans may seriously tip the obesity scales, but when it comes to chowing down on fried wedges of potato, apparently we want full fat or nothing at all. At least, that’s what the demise of Burger King’s line of Satisfries seems to reveal. The fast-food giant announced on Wednesday that because of a lack of customer demand, it is discontinuing the relatively healthier french fry product.

“Earlier this week, franchisees in North America were given the option to continue offering Satisfries in markets where this game-changing product continues to perform well,” the company announced in a statement, according to Bloomberg Businessweek. Two-thirds of restaurants chose to ditch the product.

The fries were first made available last September as part of Burger King’s effort to appeal to folks who might be on the hunt for healthier menu options. Satisfries were marketed as “great tasting crinkle-cut french fries with 40 percent less fat and 40 percent fewer calories” than McDonald’s french fries.

Consumers might have been a bit confused by the product. At $1.89 for a small container, Satisfries were more expensive than their full-fat, full-calorie counterpart, which are $1.59. A small box of Satisfries racked up 270 calories, 11 grams of fat, and 300 milligrams of sodium—not much less than the 340 calories, 15 grams of fat, and 480 milligrams of sodium found in the same-size traditional fries.

There’s also the tiny detail that when customers walk into a Burger King, they’re not usually on the hunt for a healthier food choice. “They go to fast food restaurants like Burger King for indulgence,” Darren Tristano, executive vice president of food industry consultant Technomic Inc., told NBC News.

So what do Americans want instead? This week Burger King also announced that because of grassroots demand on Twitter and Facebook, its previously discontinued Chicken Fries are back. As one fan enthused on Facebook about the fat-, sodium-, and calorie-packed product, “When you guys got rid of these I stopped going there my one to two times a week and only went a couple times a year after that. So time to kick back into gear and get my chicken fries on!”


Pizza Hut Grows Stale with American Diners

August 28, 2014

35a5f4ba06ee437491f8f75417fb078bBy Venessa Wong, Businessweek

Pizza Hut, the country’s largest pizza chain, seems to be losing favor with American diners.
The 56-year-old pizza restaurant’s same-store sales in the U.S. have fallen for seven consecutive quarters as competitors Domino’s (DPZ +1.35%) and Papa John’s (PZZA +0.56%) have seen sales increase.
“We’re obviously disappointed with second-quarter results and particularly with the very poor performance in our U.S. business,” David Novak, the chief executive of parent company Yum Brands (YUM +0.50%), said of Pizza Hut during an earnings call in July. “We’ve had our ebbs and flows versus the competition over the years, and I can assure you we will be back,” Novak told investors.

Pizza Hut remains the largest pizza chain in the U.S. by far, with more than 7,800 restaurants — it continues to add more locations. But, says Darren Tristano, executive vice president at research firm Technomic, as quick-service competitors such as Papa John’s, Domino’s, and Little Caesars cut into Pizza Hut’s U.S. business, new fast-casual, made-to-order pizza concepts are also expected to steal market share.

Pizza Hut’s recent menu launches — such as crazy cheesy crust pizza, three cheese stuffed crust pizza, and Blake Shelton-endorsed BBQ sauce pizza — have failed to improve results.

The chain is focused heavily on China, where it is developing Pizza Hut as a more upscale casual dining restaurant rather than as a delivery and takeout joint. It now has 1,134 sit-down locations in China — where sales are increasing — and just 215 delivery shops. In the U.S., only 14 percent of Pizza Hut’s business is dine-in.

Pizza Hut spokesman Doug Terfehr says China has not been a distraction. “Both our domestic and international businesses are incredibly important to the health of our brand,” he said in an e-mail. “As we’ve matured around the world, we’ve developed dedicated resources to handle that growth without wavering on our commitments to our business here.”

Terfehr cited recent efforts, such as a dessert partnership with Hershey (HSY +0.02%) that kicked off with an 8-inch cookie, the addition of equipment to all Pizza Hut restaurants to serve Wing Street chicken, and updating its website and app this spring as major turnaround efforts.

Bigger changes are on the way. Novak told investors that Pizza Hut will “launch a number of major initiatives in the United States to reignite sales beginning in the fourth quarter,” including plans to boost millennial-targeted advertising and digital marketing and a greater focus on value.

Brisket Channel proves to be ultimate reality TV

August 27, 2014

Article by: David Phelps, Star Tribune

© 2014 Star Tribune

Remember the Brisket Channel on Duluth TV?

It was on for 13 hours and five minutes over the Memorial Day weekend.

It turned out to be quite a hit, once reruns made it to YouTube. Nearly 400,000 viewers tuned into the Internet version of the smoked brisket marathon developed for Arby’s by the Minneapolis ad agency Fallon.

So popular was the website that each unique visitor spent an average of 38 minutes on the site, watching a brisket slow cook in the same manner that Arby’s prepares brisket for its customers. It also helped that visitors had a chance to win one of $20,000 in prizes that included a 10-gallon hat, lasso and beef-scented candles.

“We were blown away by that,” said Matt Heath, Fallon creative director, of the viewership.

And the client was pleased. “Thirty-eight minutes is longer than a lot of TV shows,” said Jeff Baker, Arby’s senior brand experience director. “It was a great idea based on simplicity.”

Besides setting a Guinness record for the longest TV commercial, the brisket show and limited brisket sandwich offer set the stage for Arby’s new “we have the meats” advertising campaign that Fallon launched earlier this month.

Results for the fledging ad campaign so far are inconclusive. But Rocky Novak, Fallon’s managing director, said: “We’re seeing a lot of social media love.” Arby’s said it does not release sales figures. But when it first made the brisket sandwich limited-time-offer available in October of 2013, “we declared it the most successful [limited-time offer] in the brand’s 50-year history,’’ said a spokesman Wednesday.

Gone as Arby’s pitchman is Bo Dietl, the former New York City police detective who was the face and voice of Arby’s for nearly two years. To quote Dietl from a commercial for Arby’s fish sandwich, “Really?” Yeah, really.

In fact, the new Arby’s commercials are faceless. The only human element seen by viewers is of a person from the shoulders down wearing a chef’s jacket. A roast beef or turkey or corned beef sandwich is the star of the commercial.

“The LSR [limited service restaurant or fast food] industry is not hyper-focused on food. There are a lot of entertainment factors,” said Heath. “We wanted to see how close we could get to the food. We didn’t want to put a face in there. It’s about the finished product.”

Among the tag lines used for the new set of Arby’s commercials are “this is meatcraft,” “fear not the meats,” “meats crafted with a heavy hand” and “it will change you.”

“We feel like we have an incredible heritage of meats and that presenting them in a simple way was the best way,” Baker said in an interview earlier this week.

Brand overhaul

Arby’s new advertising campaign will be accompanied by a new branding campaign that the Atlanta-based company announced in June. The branding effort includes remodeled exteriors, revitalized interiors and staff training.

Based on some consumer testing, Arby’s message and image could use a little retooling.

According to the food industry consulting firm Technomic, sales and market share at Arby’s have declined in each of the last two years, placing the roast beef king a distant second behind Subway in the non-hamburger sandwich sector and ahead of a hard-charging Jimmy John’s.

“Arby’s is considered to be unique because its about roast beef, not hamburgers, not chicken. We’re talking about an older, nostalgic brand,” said Darren Tristano, executive vice president for Chicago-based Technomic. “Clearly there are some advertising opportunities and some innovative opportunities.”

Novak said the new Arby’s advertising campaign is all about what goes between a bun or two pieces of bread in the Arby’s kitchen.

“The main takeaway first and foremost is that this is about the meat that is put in the sandwich,” Novak said.

Tristano said Arby’s scores well with consumers on a number of metrics, including service, decor and “craveability.” But it doesn’t score so well on prices, healthy options and “advertising that makes me hungry.”

“By focusing on what differentiates you, that creates memorable and creative advertising,” Tristano said. “Freshness gives you a stronger feel of healthiness.”

And credit for a new Arby’s feel may come down to a Texas-smoked brisket that took 13 hours to cook and five minutes to carve.


Wahoo’s Grows Up

August 26, 2014

Ray-wahoosgrowsup-OCBJ-599x1024Paul Hughes

Orange County Business Journal

© 2014 Orange County Business Journal. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Chain Gets Past Downturn, Puts Corporate Vet in Kitchen

Wahoo’s Fish Taco wants to keep it casual for customers even as it tightens up the way the 61-restaurant chain goes about its business.

That’s a shift for a company with laid-back Orange County roots-its dining rooms are monuments to surf and skate culture, with stickers for various brands dominating the decor.

It also is a response to some bruises sustained during the recent recession.

“Like everyone else, we’ve had a rough couple years,” said Wing Lam, a cofounder who is the chain’s public face.

The recession left behind a new catch phrase for established restaurant chains, he said: “Flat is the new up.”

It’s been up and down for Wahoo’s, according to Lam, with a dip last year. The Santa Ana-based chain’s 61 restaurants-34 company-owned and 27 run by franchisees-accounted for sales of $52 million, a 4% drop.

The chain is back on a growth track this year, according to Lam.

“We’ve had growth every month through July compared to the last two years,” he said.

Most of the restaurants are seeing revenue growth between 2% to 8%, he said.

The aim now is to establish a new approach that provides more structure to a lot of the processes that go into getting food to customers.

Lam and his brothers Ed Lee and Mingo Lee cofounded Wahoo’s with Steve Karfaridis, the company’s chief operating officer, in 1988. It grew into a small roster of restaurants and began franchising in 1993, often to the founders’ friends.

By 2010, it had 54 locations, including 21 franchises in California, Hawaii, Colorado and Texas, and was aiming for 70 in early 2013.

The push for expansion through franchising led to the 2010 hire of Tom Orbe as a vice president, an early step toward a more formal approach for the chain. Orbe was a franchisee himself and still operates a Wahoo’s in Temecula and another in Huntington Beach.

Trying to grow through the economic downturn produced mixed results.

Wahoo’s didn’t make it to 70 restaurants it has closed three since 2012, including one in New York, its first on the East Coast.

Deals in Arizona and Rhode Island also haven’t panned out.

The chain is adjusting, with plans to open a restaurant in Philadelphia in November. It’s rethinking its bid in New York, where the initial location was in Manhattan. It’s now eyeing suburban Westchester and Long Island for another try.

Wahoo’s added a location in Japan last year, and the chain wants more overseas.

It also has a big project in the works in its backyard: a restaurant at the Honda Center.

“Good Hard Look”

The strong start this year hasn’t deterred Wahoo’s from longer-term strategies.

“We’re taking a good hard look at systems and putting most of our resources there,” said Karfaridis.

He said Wahoo’s will bring point-of-sale, labor management and accounting to cloud based hosting.

Wahoo’s also plans to add ordering to its smartphone app, he said.

Another big effort is focused on supplier relationships, a key to containing costs and saving time.

A roasted salsa, for example, is shipped almost ready to Wahoo’s restaurants by a supplier working from one of the chain’s proprietary recipes.

“They create the base, and we finish it,” Karfaridis said.

Another supplier starts the teriyaki sauce, but each location completes it. A meat vendor pre-slices came asada-something that used to be done by Wahoo’s staff in the restaurants.

“As you grow, you come to a decision point,” Karfaridis said. “How do you preserve the spirit of the food while growing? How do you scale Wahoo’s without compromising quality?”

Balancing Act

It’s a balancing act for a chain that’s facing new levels of competition, said Darren Tristano, executive vice president of Chicagobased restaurant industry researcher Technomic Inc.

“They have to build on the menu and flavors without straying too far from the core tastes,” Tristano said. “The fish taco made them popular, but fish tacos are everywhere now.”

Karfaridis said customers often guided menus at individual restaurants.

“They’d say, T want my Maui bowl in a burrito,’ so we created the Banzai Burrito,” he said.

That produced good relations but inconsistent results across the chain.

Karfaridis said Wahoo’s wants to keep the close-up feel of the chain but streamline the process.

Wahoo’s brought on Raymond Martin in January to work on the menu.

He had stints at Huntington Beach-based BJ’s Restaurants Inc. and Calabasas Hillsbased Cheesecake Factory Inc.

Less Complexity

His mandate is to reduce complexity and costs in food preparation and presentation while maintaining or improving taste and service.

“You don’t want to waste steps or product, and customers are looking for new flavors,” Martin said.

He said he got a better price and more consistent product on tortillas through a new deal with Irving, Texas-based Mission Foods, a major supplier.

He focused on fewer ingredients with strong flavors-ginger, garlic and onions for its teriyaki sauce.

Martin cut the cooking time on came asada to retain more meat and juice. The beef continues to cook as it comes hot off the grill, ensuring its still cooked properly when it reaches the customer.

“You keep more meat, use less sauce and get the same amount of product,” Martin said.

He added a table salsa by tweaking Wahoo’s legendary pico de gallo-which is also still available-and is testing a spicy ketchup, a southwestern ranch sauce, smashed beans and seasoned onion rings.

Don’t expect sweeping changes-Lam said fish is still king.

Nearly half of Wahoo’s customers are going to eat something with fish in it, he said.

“You can get a chicken burrito from anyone,” Lam said. “But there’s only so much fish out there, and we have a great relationship with our suppliers.”

Honda Center

Martin estimated 80% of the menu has been improved in some big or small way.

Tristano said Technomic’s research on Wahoo’s consistently reveals high levels of consumer loyalty.

That meets the benchmark set out by the chain’s owners.

“Nothing will be compromised,” Karfaridis said. “We’re adding scalability and leaving the core qualities intact.”

Back in 2010, when Wahoo’s brought Orbe to boost franchising, he said the chain could grow to 400 or 500 locations but didn’t want to do it in “cookie-cutter” style.

Lam used the same term last year to describe what he intends to guard against in the latest push for growth.

“While Chef Ray is working, I’m out there gallivanting in the Wahoo’s (food) truck testing the theories,” Lam said. “Then he and I compare notes.”

Lam said not all of his ideas translate into good-or cost-effective-products on the wider scale that Martin’s been hired to oversee.

“He’s about process and presentation, and I’m about convenience and flavor, and we meet in the middle,” Lam said.

The results of the collaboration will get a showcase when Wahoo’s opens in the Honda Center this fall.

Success there could lead to another growth push and more hires for Wahoo’s management team, Karfaridis said.

“We can bring in people to do that,” he said. “This has been four guys doing all of it on the run for a long time.”

Wahoo’s Fish Taco wants to keep it casual for customers even as it tightens up the way the 61-restaurant chain goes about its business. A roasted salsa, for example, is shipped almost ready to Wahoo’s restaurants by a supplier working from one of the chain’s proprietary recipes. How do you scale Wahoo’s without compromising quality?” Balancing Act It’s a balancing act for a chain that’s facing new levels of competition, said Darren Tristano, executive vice president of Chicagobased restaurant industry researcher Technomic Inc. “They have to build on the menu and flavors without straying too far from the core tastes,” Tristano said.


5 Reasons Burger King Wins with Tim Hortons Beyond the Tax Inversion

August 25, 2014

Print

Yesterday Burger King announced plans to acquire Canadian coffee-café chain Tim Hortons, which would enable the burger chain to relocate its headquarters to Canada. The move would lower its tax obligations, a fact the media has latched onto. But even without the so-called tax inversion, Burger King could win with the deal. Here’s how.

  1. Burger King continues to compete in the breakfast daypart, and coffee is essential to attracting patrons. Although Burger King has integrated Seattle’s Best coffee into its breakfast offering, replacing it with Tim Hortons’ premium-blend 100% Arabica bean could be a more financially advantageous opportunity on coffee purchasing.
  1. With increased emphasis on global brand growth, a combined Burger King/Tim Hortons provides strong growth opportunity through co-branding. Giving potential licensees the opportunity to offer a strong breakfast/lunch offering from Tim’s and lunch/dinner offering from Burger King maximizes rents and revenues.
  1. Competing with McDonald’s has become a challenge for larger brands. Since both Tim’s and Burger King compete with the global burger giant, Burger King should get a leg up in the competition. With greater opportunities to fine tune their Canadian operations, Tim’s knowledge of the market should support BK’s strategy and planning in Canada and create stronger competition with McDonald’s stores overall.
  1. Consumer loyalty and sentiment toward Burger King would likely improve with the Tim Hortons marriage. As the majority of Tim Hortons’ customers are brand fans, the strong emotional connection could carry over to Burger King with the new relationship. Emotional connections are important to younger Millennial consumer, and the connection could help strengthen brand perceptions.
  1. Out-of-the-bun thinking is becoming increasingly important to consumers. Menu innovation, limited-time offerings and the need to build what’s new and what’s next on the menu is important for consumers to maintain relevance to restaurant operators. The crossover of Tim Hortons’ and Burger King’s insight and development teams can provide some new perspective and ideally leverage staff experience and skills to support ongoing development programs.

Final Thoughts: Although this investment makes strong financial sense, the post-investment reality will be on leveraging synergies that exist and maximizing the relationship with new emphasis on overall brand growth objectives. How quickly each brand accepts the new realities and bands together culturally will determine the expected success.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers